smallworld
01-06-2008, 01:43 AM
Ok so I tried Rockit 4.0 and its ok,BUT kinda used to 3.2.Remember that I only run audio and no video.To me 3.2 is more user friendly.Does anyone else feel the same or is it just me?:sqlaugh:
![]() |
|
3.2 vs. 4.0smallworld 01-06-2008, 01:43 AM Ok so I tried Rockit 4.0 and its ok,BUT kinda used to 3.2.Remember that I only run audio and no video.To me 3.2 is more user friendly.Does anyone else feel the same or is it just me?:sqlaugh: Papa Deuce 01-06-2008, 01:48 AM Not me... I absolutely LOVE the upgrade. SoftJock Rick 01-06-2008, 06:13 PM Ok so I tried Rockit 4.0 and its ok,BUT kinda used to 3.2.Remember that I only run audio and no video.To me 3.2 is more user friendly.Does anyone else feel the same or is it just me?:sqlaugh: Ahhh, the age old paradox. Do I let Rockit stagnate, or do I move it forward to meet new challenges, hardware, etc... Yes, there is a learning curve. But hopefully, it is one that is worth the effort... :) Randy A 01-06-2008, 06:26 PM I'll put it this way.....I played with V3.2 for about a full year, but it didn't persuade me to make a switch to digital, but neither did any of the other software packages that I tried. I had been waiting (patiently) for the release of V4.0 in the hopes it would have the things I desired. I knew that Rick had been working hard on getting it upgraded due to many requests from V3.2 users. I fell in love with V4.0 immediately and as I use it more, I'm finding more things I like about it. And, the best part, Rick is already working on a few tweaks that will make it better. But, you know the good part, you don't have to upgrade to it. You can continue to use the V3.2 that you've learned to use and love. Continue to have fun with it. No need to reinvent the wheel if you don't want too. | |