Logo

Personal Review of the Bose System

Harryoke
12-30-2006, 07:05 PM
I was fortunate to be able to road test the controversial Bose "stick system" the other day, and would like to share my observations. Much of this will be fact, and some will be my personal opinion.

I would like to again thank Cap Capello for the demonstration. He is a well known DJ in the NY area and is an independent Bose distributor. Also would like to thank Orlando's Marc Burgess for coordinating everything, and thank the other DJs in the Orlando area who brought their gear in for a field comparison.

The very first thing I learned is that it is no longer called the PAS system due to some copyright infringement issues, so I will refer to it as the L1, Bose system, or stick system. The system comes with several components, first being the L1 tower, and the B1 "bass bin"...not called a subwoofer because of the frequency it actually operates at. A basic system is a stick and a bin, with 2 bins recommended. For DJ/Karaoke or larger applications, it is recommended to have 2 sticks and 4 bins. This is the combination I got to play with.

I have been wanting to field test one of these for awhile, but the Guitar Center was out of stock when I really wanted to go do it, and I have found out that GC is not the best place to road test it anyway, as most of the salespeople are not trained to demo it in the best light. Fortunately, Cap is a factory trained rep, and we got a far better demo than GC could ever provide. (PLUG: BTW, if you ever need more info, have questions or want to buy one of these systems, call Cap! He can be found at www.imadj.com , or 866.999.7451)

Assembly is quick and foolproof. The stick bases have all the controls and connections on board, so drop the 35 pound base on the ground, insert 15 pound bottom of stick, connect 12 pound top of stick (no effort required in assembly, drops into place with ease) then position the 24 lb bass bin(s). Connect wire from base to bins, jump bins if using multiples, then run the output from your source to the base and you are in business. Power up the bases and the system is ready. You cannot make a mistake or blow up the system while installing/breaking down. You can plug and unplug and disconnect to your hearts content, and the system has fault interrupters to diminish the sound briefly, then compensate for the missing or added component.

The bases can be used as a lite mixer depending on your application. You can plug you instrument, source or mic directly into the L1, or you can run everything thru a mixer and output that to the L1. For my conversation, I will stick to DJ/KJ applications.

The L1 has an analog dial for presets on the base. This is a quasi equalizer, with preset settings based on your input source. For our application it is best left at the default "00" setting, or the optional "57" setting which would more resemble the smiley face on a regular EQ. There is also a gain knob on the L1 base to tweak the signal from the input source if necessary.

The bases have 3 amps of about 250watts. One amp drives the top of the stick, one the bottom of the stick, and one to the bass bins. There are no specs available on the ohms or other minutiae we all find so interesting.

Now the controversy of opinion, LOL...

Once powered up, the L1 system has an impressive sound, not the knock you over the head kind of sound, but the appreciable nice even tone that Bose is famous for. The even blend is evident, and you can see the selling point of the even volume thru the room, and the 180 degrees sound dispersion. You can have a conversation standing in front of the dj booth, just as easy as in the back of the room. The bass was adequate at moderate listening levels. The 4 bins are recommended to be stacked one on top of the other, then both stacks brought within 8 inches of each other, to maximize the bass production. This did seem to produce "enough" bass at "adequate" listening volume.

Now...if you are the guy who needs throbbing bass, or the guy who is bringing in subs to your show and bridging multiple amps to shake the floor, then, NO, this is not the system for you. THIS SYSTEM IS NOT FOR EVERYBODY, and even Cap (the fellow who demonstrated the system) conceded to that fact.

A quick analogy... When the Mazda Miata came out, I was quite enamored of it, as it had a lot of technology and thought put into it and it was like nothing else available when it came out. I wanted to buy one, BUT, it would not accommodate my lifestyle, since I needed something with a scosh more cargo area. This fact does not diminish the fact it is a great car, but merely would not work for me.

The L1 system is a great system which has turned traditional physics of sound on its proverbial ear, BUT, it IS NOT the be all end all savior to all. Like I said before, if you are the guy carting in racks of amps and multiple bins, this is not for you. If you are the guy carrying two powered speakers on stands with your DJ stuff, this could be an upgrade...

We road tested the system in comparison to 3 other systems, the JBL EON powered system, the Mackie and Behringer powered systems. Now, the powered systems could keep up with the Bose in terms of volume and bass, and possibly in some areas SURPASSED the Bose system. Where the Bose always shined was in the even sound dispersion and clarity. When we played hip hop music thru the L1 system, I must say that the limitations of the bass reproduction was revealed. This is no replacement for you if you need those LOW frequencies to move your floor.

Where the system WOULD shine...large areas needing ambient, non intrusive sound, small areas where traditional gear may not fit, acoustically challenging areas, jobs where sensitive ears are (elderlys, children...). I could see musicians using this for sound as small trios, or bar/coffee house players...it is not gonna fill an arena by any means...but, I could see this being used in a VERY large room and being able to accommodate most mobile DJ events, as long as you are not the guy who needs the overwhelming volume or bass. Another neat feature is that you can place the L1 anywhere that there is an electrical outlet, use a wireless guitar hookup and place the L1 far away from the DJ source. For our demo, we took the stick out in the lobby of the hotel, a good 150 feet away or more, hooked up a wireless receiver, and rocked the lobby while the other L1 was in the room.

Me personally, I play a bunch of different venues, and I think it would work for most of them, except for the nights where I need some throbbing bass...in which case I break out my Yorkville Cabinets and move more air volume. For about any gig that I use my EONS at, the Bose would probably be a great replacement....

BUT, lets talk cost. 2 sticks and 4 bins are gonna run you just under $4400 for everything including wires and cases. That is a substantial investment. This again creates a division in opinion. If you cannot afford it or justify the expense, then move on...the cost does not affect the performance, and the fact that it may be priced out of your reach is not a reflection on the performance of the unit. If you are one who can justify the price by being able to sell the upcharge to your customers, this will be a good fit for you. It is all up to the person who buys the unit, and their sales skills.

At the demo, I felt the 2 JBLs (with no sub) produced more bass and adequate volume to compete. Again, they did not have the dispersion the Bose had, but, with any powered or passive speaker system you can EQ changes to the room and make your hardware shine to your ears liking. This is a downside to the Bose system...everything about the Bose systems componentry is proprietary, meaning you don't want to process the sound at a preamp level because the Bose system has onboard processors to quasi override your preamp instructions...that is, if you add more bass preamp, the Bose may knock some off at the processor level.

When I bought my passive EONs, they were not the best sounding speaker in the store...the wooden cabinet speakers had them beat, BUT, I knew that they were only 38 lbs, and that I would be lifting them nightly, and that I could EQ them to sound the way I wanted with properly matched hardware. These are my work horses now, and if a component breaks, I have any option for backup...replacement speaker, amp etc... With the Bose system, I would fear if a component failed, such as the amp(s) in the base, there would be no remedy for a quick fix other than pulling your old system out of dry-dock... A lot of the DJs at the demo quipped about putting their old stuff on EBay once they get the Bose system....and I look at that proposition and scoff, because the Bose is NOT component replaceable by anything other than the same piece. That, as a road working pro, is a little scary to me. The only other option would be to buy a backup L1 just in case. That is an expensive proposition.

If you are the guy/gal who cannot lift much, and need good sound reproduction at a light weight, or you need to be able to pack your gear into a car, or if you work in any arena of the specific description I mentioned earlier (kids, elderlys etc...), or need portability and wireless capability, this may be for you if you can justify the price vs. the benefits.

Again I repeat, for the sake of the controversy, THIS SYSTEM IS NOT FOR EVERYONE, but for those whose lifestyle it fits, it is a good piece. I would love to go buy a Mini Cooper today, but the only vehicle compatible with MY LIFESTYLE right now is a full size cargo van. If you are driving a cargo van too, don't say the Cooper is crap just because you cant make it do what your cargo van does, LOL.... just don't buy the Cooper, LOL!

FIN

Tyrone Blue
12-30-2006, 07:50 PM
Chuck, are you listening? Everyone. I'd like to say kudos for the excellent product review of the L1 system. When you are posting your replies, let's keep it factual and civil.

If you don't own the system or have not giving it a workout as above... keep your comments within your range of expertise. NO slamming or speculation allowed!

djxpress
12-30-2006, 08:13 PM
Thanks for the review!!! It sounds like a perfect system for a primarily wedding-type event DJ(IMO). I am happy with my set up and I am sure that those who spend the money, enjoy it. To each their own...thx

Chuck The DJ
12-30-2006, 08:55 PM
Harry,,, a big giant mahalo for your review... I agree with everything that you said. I have never said that this system is for everyone.

I'm lucky enough to not only own the BOSE L1 system but another speaker system as well that I use for, 1- outside gigs, because I don't wanna mess up my BOSE and 2- when I do younger parties like the school dance that I did a couple of weeks ago.

Tyrone,,, I'm always listening! :) You just never know when I'm going to respond. :)

Ken Petersen
12-30-2006, 09:01 PM
IWhere the system WOULD shine...large areas needing ambient, non intrusive sound, small areas where traditional gear may not fit, acoustically challenging areas, jobs where sensitive ears are (elderlys, children...). I could see musicians using this for sound as small trios, or bar/coffee house players...it is not gonna fill an arena by any means...but, I could see this being used in a VERY large room and being able to accommodate most mobile DJ events, as long as you are not the guy who needs the overwhelming volume or bass.


Taken last night.
http://rap.midco.net/kpetersen/Setups/L1/CIMG0032.JPG

http://rap.midco.net/kpetersen/Setups/L1/CIMG0035.JPG

http://rap.midco.net/kpetersen/Setups/L1/CIMG0039.JPG

http://rap.midco.net/kpetersen/Setups/L1/CIMG0036.JPG

Jon Tuck
12-30-2006, 09:06 PM
so Ken did you leave them pointing to the rear corners away from the head table all night and for a particular reason? Beings they disperse evenly throughout the room. Just curious help me calm the curiousity factor thanks!!

Ken Petersen
12-30-2006, 09:17 PM
Jay, and others that would have noticed the detail! THANK YOU!

This is one hall that sets the DJ up in the center of the room.

The images you see above are from the start of the event last night.


The first time I ever played there with the L1's (this spring), I drew these diagrams to assist making a decision as to how to set up.

The choices I had were:
http://rap.midco.net/kpetersen/Setups/PAS/5SHICCEarly.JPG

or

http://rap.midco.net/kpetersen/Setups/PAS/5SHICCEarly1.JPG

What is pictured is the second choice.


I elected to post these images because of the "minimalist footprint" perspective. The guests are seated behind the DJ. Boxes, stackes, or speakers on a stick are going to inhibit the view of the head table by guests sitting behind the DJ.

Chuck The DJ
12-30-2006, 09:30 PM
Very nice Ken....

Jon Tuck
12-30-2006, 09:31 PM
Ditto as always very clean and professional looking even with the banner!! LOL J/K

djxpress
12-31-2006, 12:31 AM
This is one hall that sets the DJ up in the center of the room.



Nice Ken, I will have to admit that in my 20+ years in the bizz, I have never set up in the middle of a room. New one to me...thx

Fred Stewart
12-31-2006, 03:08 AM
Greets, Harry and thanks.

For my part I appreciate your honest reviews on a comparison between the L1 and a conventional PA system. From a sound reinforcement aspect, comparisons between a line array system (the L1) and conventional FOH are discouraged due to the inherent differences between the system types.

Thanks again, my friend.

Chuck The DJ
12-31-2006, 03:14 AM
Fred,,, I looked at the comparisonsn not as one between two different types of systems ie: line aray and FOH, but as a comparison between two popular speakers set-ups that DJs buy,,,,

If ya know what I mean? I'm not a techy guy.

Harryoke
12-31-2006, 03:21 AM
With a traditional DJ set up, I cant imagine how I would approach setting up in that room...that would be a new one for me as well. I dont know where I would aim the speakers...would feel kind of funny facing the dance floor with the speakers backward, or vice versa.

I like my back against the wall, facing the action, with the speakers covering the whole room!

Weirdest setup I ever encountered was an "L" shaped ballroom...I was at the top of the L by the fireplace set up with the dance floor...and the guests were seated toward the middle to the bottom of the L. The head table was at the bottom of the L completely out of my sight. That was hideous.

Jeff Romard
12-31-2006, 10:49 AM
Nice review Harry

musicdoctordj
12-31-2006, 05:38 PM
I did a wedding in one of those 'L' shaped rooms . . .

I was set up in the far right of the bottom of the 'L' and the dance floor was in the corner where the two straight lines of the 'L' connect and the whole bottom of the 'L'!

The head table was at the top of the 'L' with all of the tables set up between the head table and the bottom of the 'L'.

I argued with the hall about this setup . . . but that was their way and they would not change it!

Ahh . . . to 'L' with it . . . :sqbiggrin:

Harryoke
01-01-2007, 05:36 PM
I guess that is when you need to place a wireless video camera at the head table and dance floor and virtually DJ using a laptop to monitor the event that you cant see...LOL... For that matter, why even show up, set the camera and sound up and do it from home or office, LOL... Or, get WalMart to start setting up PAs for $150 and outsource the virtual DJ to India!! Yeah!!

Better idea...just place us DJs where we can effectively do what we are paid to do!!

Harryoke
01-01-2007, 06:24 PM
I sent my brother a copy of my review...he attended the demo with me, and he is not a DJ or sound guy. He mentioned my omitting the following point...and as it is a technical point I left it out, but since he brought it up it made sense to post it here.

Cap mentioned a fact about using digital equipment vs CDs. He mentioned the fact that converting to mp3 was "not compression, but surgery". That when music is ripped to MP3 there is a loss, especially in the lower number bitrates. He recommended ripping at NO LESS than 192, and he mentioned that if you are using digital files at a bit rate lower than 192, that the L1 system would probably reveal that limitation. He basically stated if you are the guy dl'ing 128 bitrate digital to DJ with, that the L1 system may not be for you.

On the opinion front, I am not sure that the audible difference is clear to most, as I dj with digital files from varied sources, and I can play you some ripped at 96 that will shake the walls. I think to every fact there are exceptions though. Certainly, discs played on a CD player are going to sound premium through any system...digital can sound fine, but I dont know that the appreciable loss in quality is going to be THAT evident to the listeners, nor do I feel, in my opinion, that the Bose would reveal any loss that much more significantly than a regular PA system. The point was made by Cap in deference to bass response. I would re-comment on that that if THAT much bass is important to you, you are probably not a L1 customer to begin with.

An excerpt from my brothers email to me: "Cap thought that this was important enough to point out and to incrementally play songs with higher bit rates to show the improved sound...Since most D.J.s these days are working from MP-3 files, it might be a shock if they invest in this system only to find out that their highly compressed files can't be rendered as good as they should."

Scott Hanna
01-01-2007, 06:46 PM
harry,
thanks for your review. i totally agree that using inferior media with a top quality sound system doesn't make sense.
we are only as strong as our weakest link.

Steve Miller
01-01-2007, 08:10 PM
Harry,

If you are going to use media that already has a loss of frequencies, you certainly don't want to use it on a system with a limited frequency response curve. Doing so will simply make what is already evident to many of our ears much more pronounced.

Chuck The DJ
01-02-2007, 02:19 AM
Stevie.... ........ ....... oh nevermind

thatmusicguy
01-02-2007, 02:29 AM
I'll ask the question......

QUOTE - "you certainly don't want to use it on a system with a limited frequency response curve"

How, if specs aren't available, How do you know?..or perhaps you don't mean the L1...but then again this is an L1 thread.

With all due respect, this is the type of "back-handed dig" that just gets my goat....someone's just gotta get one in.

I feel your pain Chuck.....

Chuck The DJ
01-02-2007, 02:52 AM
Mahalo this Steve not the other Steve... :) Not a dig at Steve just wanna keep my Steve's straight!

I was gonna let it go, but before my stats change here... I don't give a crap about specs... I don't know nothing about them and in my 21 years have NEVER bought ANY piece of gear because of specs,,,

All I care about is how it works on the job. If I buy something and it doesn't git er done,,, it goes back.

Do my BOSE git er done? For me at 90% of my gigs yeah!!

My gig at the Hrad Rock Cafe' last night proves it. I was nervouse about taking that system in there and as I was unloading my van almost took in my other set up.... but I said no, I'll never know if I don't push it and you know what? I frikkin rocked and the system rocked even harder..

Do I care about frikin specs, no. It got the job done in a way that please me more than I could have thought!

Do I care that some take shots at this system... yes.... and I'm real close to going off on some people but I'll be good.

For as much as some people like nothing better than to take a shot at anything BOSE I can be there to take a shot (edit) their system.

I'm sure that I can find something wrong with ANY piece of gear that someone posts, nothing is a perfect piece of gear, not even da BOSE...

So let it go... I'm all for fixing the site here so that anytime the words BOSE, L1, B1, Power Stand, Towers come up, it automatically gets edited...

In fact, just to be fair, I think that we should set it up so ANY name of gear automatically gets edited... yes, that's the ticket!! Let's do that!

Fred, are you reading this,,,, makes ya think doesn't it? LOL (that's an inside note between me and Fred) :)

Now sit back, grab your fave drink and chill out,,,, it's what I'm gonna do for the next few hours before I head off to my next gig where I won't be using my EDIT system I'll be using my other EDIT system that I use for my teen events....

musicdoctordj
01-02-2007, 03:20 AM
...Since most D.J.s these days are working from MP-3 files...




I think that this is not a true fact.

In the real world of all DJ's combined I think you'll find that the majority are still using CD's . . . not PC's!

Will that change?

In the future . . . yes!

But today . . . the CD is still what most of us are using . . .

Papa Deuce
01-02-2007, 03:24 AM
I think that this is not a true fact.

In the real world of all DJ's combined I think you'll find that the majority are still using CD's . . . not PC's!

Will that change?

In the future . . . yes!

But today . . . the CD is still what most of us are using . . .

I agree... and I use both.

Fred Stewart
01-02-2007, 04:09 AM
Thanks, Chuck.

Yup... I been readin'. I don't know much about the L1 so I can't comment on it either way. :D

Anyhoo, welcome to the asylum.

jfactor1
01-02-2007, 06:10 AM
I would be very interested in trying the L1 tops with my 18" RCF sub.

Steve Miller
01-02-2007, 09:40 AM
Chuck,

I have only purchased one system that I was unable to see the specs on.

I do most of my shopping based on specs. The specifications of a particular piece of gear tell you what it is capable of producing, how it will react in a given situation and what you can expect of it. For anyone in sound reproduction for a living the specs on a piece of gear is of the utmost importance.

The one and only time I bought a piece of gear that I had not studied the specs on I found a huge disappointment.

With the proper equipment a general frequency response can be attained for any speaker, I know that a simple shop setup won't be 100% accurate but it will at least put you in the ballpark. Until chamber tested response curves are published it will have to do.

Frankly I can tell the difference between songs ripped at 128 and those ripped at higher bit rates, my personal choice is a compromise between good sound and file size and I decided to use 256. Listen to a song ripped at 128 on your computer speakers and then on a full blown sound system with subs and tell me you can't tell the difference, then pop in a CD of the same song and again tell me you can't hear the difference! It is obvious. If you have a system unable to produce a given frequency range at the top and the bottom and then play a song which has already been chopped through and through you are going to again reduce even more of the material.

It's just logic!

Double C Deejays
01-02-2007, 12:57 PM
I would be very interested in trying the L1 tops with my 18" RCF sub.


no you would'nt:sqwink:

Harryoke
01-02-2007, 06:03 PM
I would be very interested in trying the L1 tops with my 18" RCF sub.

Bose and its reps do not recommend mixing their components with other manufacturers as the Bose components are matched to each other to work with their processors and amps, etc... Not to say mixing COULDNT accidentally produce a good result, but they dont recommend it.

Harryoke
01-02-2007, 06:05 PM
I think that this is not a true fact.

In the real world of all DJ's combined I think you'll find that the majority are still using CD's . . . not PC's!

Will that change?

In the future . . . yes!

But today . . . the CD is still what most of us are using . . .

That was actually an observation from my brother, who is not in the biz, BUT in retrospect, I am seeing most of my brethren in this area going digital in some fashion. Personally, I bring my PC and discs, and am finding myself getting thru more and more gigs without touching a disc.

Mark Beecher
01-04-2007, 06:53 PM
Hmmm. nice review but not much was mentioned about the appearance of the L1. I get HUGE compliments from banquet managers about the looks first, then the sound. Clients like the Bose name. They like it a lot. I'm happy to ride the coat tail of all their marketing. When I need bigger sound I still have my Mackie 1501. During a Christmas party a competing dj who was in the other room heard the L1s hooked up to the mackie with 2 B1s as well and now owns a pair...can't say I'm all that happy about that.

Bryan Durio
01-07-2007, 05:30 AM
On the opinion front, I am not sure that the audible difference is clear to most, as I dj with digital files from varied sources, and I can play you some ripped at 96 that will shake the walls.
Shaking the walls is not what you need to worry about with lower bitrates. Low frequencies do not have to be sampled as frequently to be reproduced accurately, but high frequencies do. You lose a lot of harmonic, spacial, and timbre information of the music when using lower bitrates, and THAT is where your concern should be.

mysoulishome
01-07-2007, 10:23 PM
128 sounds fine over headphones but sounds like crap when you give it some power and air. Sure you can boost the bass and it will still bump...but that doesn't mean it sounds good.

When I first started DJing I could not hear the difference but now I can, and 128 sounds like total rap to me.

Balanced Line
01-08-2007, 07:50 AM
A good pair of phones is the acid test for signal quality. A one hundred dollar pair of phones is better than a match for thousands of dollars worth of speakers and amplification.

Most technicians when worried about signal quality will reach for the headphones not only to localize the problem but to also be better able to hear the problem.

Steve Miller
01-08-2007, 08:00 AM
A good pair of phones is the acid test for signal quality. A one hundred dollar pair of phones is better than a match for thousands of dollars worth of speakers and amplification.

Most technicians when worried about signal quality will reach for the headphones not only to localize the problem but to also be better able to hear the problem.

Balanced you are correct and that is why a bad signal shows up worse on a PA system because you don't have a 20 to 20K frequency response as in a studio monitor or a pair of studio headphones. Instead of 20 to 20K response you are now dealing with a 38 to 50 hertz bottom end and a 16K to 18K top end. If you lower that response even more to say 85 to 12K hertz and push a bad signal throught it, it will become even more noticeable.