Sole or LLC

To many ads? Support ODJT and see no ads!
Sorry, no. YOU screw up YOU get sued. Plain and simple.
YOU are liable for YOUR actions - always.

the example my attorney gave was say you have a dump truck and trailer. the trailer comes off and kills a family in a minivan (this happened here a couple of years back).

the driver is in deep do do - he's responsible for the vehicle and hitch as he's the operator.
PLUS the company gets sued as they have the overall liability for hiring and training and supplying the equipment. plus they hve the deep(er) pockets.

Iceburg. You are just wrong. I have shown my attorney and account this and the whole point of having LLC or Scorp is so they cannot personally sue you no matter of the situation. I suggest each person here to contact their attorney and or accountant.
 
From a protecting personal assets angle, if this was an LLC or corporation, then this is exactly right. The owners personal assets are protected from a lawsuit as he was not personally involved in the accident.
 
Of course one or a company is responsible, but the family cannot sue the individual personally and drown him into debt bc he worked for the company. They have to go after the company meaning they have to sue the company, NOT the individual.

In our case as the owner of the company, they have to sue your dj company not you personally. They cannot go after your personal assets and or money tied up elsewhere.
 
Of course one or a company is responsible, but the family cannot sue the individual personally and drown him into debt bc he worked for the company. They have to go after the company meaning they have to sue the company, NOT the individual.

In our case as the owner of the company, they have to sue your dj company not you personally. They cannot go after your personal assets and or money tied up elsewhere.

The family can sue whoever they want, however they want. There is no law saying they cannot. If they sue the company and then sue the driver and the mechanic personally, they could be bound to get something from someone. The owners personal assets are protected in this instance.

If this is a small business and the owner was the driver and at fault, they could come after the company and the owner separately.
 
Last edited:
Of course one or a company is responsible, but the family cannot sue the individual personally and drown him into debt bc he worked for the company. They have to go after the company meaning they have to sue the company, NOT the individual.

In our case as the owner of the company, they have to sue your dj company not you personally. They cannot go after your personal assets and or money tied up elsewhere.

Right, but the distinction here is which individual is at fault for an incident. If you are working for your own company, you can be liable on behalf of the business as well as personally. If an employee is at fault that is not the business owner, the LLC plays an important protection role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ittigger
Keep in consideration there may be different rules in different jurisdictions too
 
  • Like
Reactions: ittigger
Right, but the distinction here is which individual is at fault for an incident. If you are working for your own company, you can be liable on behalf of the business as well as personally. If an employee is at fault that is not the business owner, the LLC plays an important protection role.

If it happens at an event or during "business," they cannot sue you personally so long as it is business related/during business. I have literally consulted with my attorney and accountant based on this thread, and yes it might be different per state, but nobody can come after me and cause me to go into debt from a lawsuit of "my" wrongdoing. They have to come after the business. It's literally the whole point of LLC, but Scorp has many more tax benefits so it's much smarter to go that route.

Weather it's an employee under your business or you yourself that causes wrongdoing, they cannot come after the business owner, only the business itself.

When you hear about settlements and lawsuits, notice you don't hear them talking about suing the owner of a company, they sue the company.
 
The family can sue whoever they want, however they want. There is no law saying they cannot. If they sue the company and then sue the driver and the mechanic personally, they could be bound to get something from someone. The owners personal assets are protected in this instance.

If this is a small business and the owner was the driver and at fault, they could come after the company and the owner separately.

That's not how it was explained to me. They can try and attempt to go after the business owner, but won't go far. The owner is protected in all aspects. Imagine how many owners would be broke if this was not true!

I asked my attorney to post here, but he is not willing to do so. Like I said earlier, I think everyone should consult with their attorney and accountant and talk realistic instances related to DJ businesses. Not hypotheticals relating to cars.
 
That's not how it was explained to me. They can try and attempt to go after the business owner, but won't go far. The owner is protected in all aspects. Imagine how many owners would be broke if this was not true!

I asked my attorney to post here, but he is not willing to do so. Like I said earlier, I think everyone should consult with their attorney and accountant and talk realistic instances related to DJ businesses. Not hypotheticals relating to cars.

Hypotheticals relating to cars? Wth? The hypothetical was a business - a dump trailer driver.

Obviously, the reason they're coming after a business or the owner depends on the situation. While it is not true that in all situations, the owner can be personally sued, there certainly are situations where they may be. How many 'owners' are actually doing the work vs running the business and have people working for them. Was the owner at fault or was an employee of the company? How is the owner running the business - is it a business standing alone or is it just another side of the owner? As an S/LLC, It would appear if an employee faults, then the S/LLC protects the personal assets of the owner. The question becomes who was at fault. Like I said earlier, I am not an attorney, nor do I play one on tv. Like you, I have also posted info from attorneys (with links) that clearly defend what I have posted.

We live in a litigious society and some people love to sue each other. There is no protection from that. Look how many people are named in a lawsuit when something happens.

Here's a good write up:
Liability Protection Fallacy Of An LLC

Scenario 1:
Can I sue the owner of a company personally if their company owes me money?

If the company that you believe owes you money was incorporated, then it is almost certainly the case that you cannot sue the owner personally. That because the owners of a corporation (or a limited liability company or LLC) are not liable for the debts and obligations of the corporation (or LLC). That's the main reason that small business--even self-employed contractors and freelancers--should set up as an LLC or corporation. There are some "limited" possibilities for recover:

1) Obviously, if the owner personally guaranteed the debt, he could be sued.

2) If the owner personally did something wrongful, it may be possible to sue him for his wrongful act as well the company for its breach.

Scenario 2:
Can a customer sue me personally even if I am i - Q&A - Avvo

I hope someone can help. One of my employees damaged a customers car accidentally (I have a small detailing business). My customer is threatening to sue my corporation and me personally. Can they go after me personally even if I didn't cause the damage? If so, how/what grounds? I thought I was protected by my corporation? I'm concerned that I might have to close my business so they don't sue me! I can't afford the expense or trouble. Help!

They can always sue you personally, but they would either have to allege that you personally did something wrong (e.g., YOU damaged the car), or allege that you are the alter ego of the corporation and that the corporate veil should be pierced because an injustice will result if they cannot go after your personal assets. Such allegations are fairly common despite the protection of the corporate shield, which is why lawyers who represent small businesses insist that the corporate formalities be observed. Presumably, you have general liability insurance, so it won't be a big deal either way. Unless your employee damaged a Duesenberg, detailing damage shouldn't be ruinous.

Scenario 3 (which explains more of what you're talking about):

As shown below: The main limitation is “in the course of business.” So, for example, if you are hit by a delivery truck making its rounds, or injured by roofing tile dropped by a roofer, that’s an injury caused by someone as they were doing their job and their employer may be liable.

Also note: However, to the extent that an injury was caused by an employee in the course of employment, you can sue the employer as well as the employee. What does this mean? It means if an employee is at fault, the business and the employee may be sued. If it's the owner performing said actions, then the business and the owner may be sued.

Business vs. Owner vs. Employee Liability for Personal Injury - AllLaw.com

If a business is legally responsible for causing your injury -- or the underlying accident that led to your injury -- you can usually file an insurance claim or personal injury lawsuit against the business. You may also, depending on the business structure, be able to sue the owner(s) as well. In rare cases, you may have a claim against the specific employee(s) who caused you injury. Read on to learn more about injury claims against a business.

Businesses are Liable for The Acts of Their Employees in the Course of Business

Under the legal theories of agency liability and respondeat superior, an employer is responsible for the acts of its employees, when those acts are done in the course of employment.

So, if the employee would liable for injuring you -- i.e. if you could sue the employee -- the employer will usually be responsible, too. The main limitation is “in the course of business.” So, for example, if you are hit by a delivery truck making its rounds, or injured by roofing tile dropped by a roofer, that’s an injury caused by someone as they were doing their job and their employer may be liable.

On the other hand, if after his shift ends, a store clerk happens to get into a fight with you in the mall parking lot, the store would not be liable -- the clerk is doing something (fighting) that is not part of his job, is on his own time, and is not in his employer’s premises.

However, to the extent that an injury was caused by an employee in the course of employment, you can sue the employer as well as the employee.

If It’s Not an LLC or a Corporation, You May be Able to Sue the Owner(s) Personally

One of the most important -- if not the most important -- purposes of a limited liability company (LLC) or corporation (inc.) is to shield the owners from business-related liability. If a business is an LLC or corporation, except in very rare, very special circumstances, you can’t sue the owners personally for any wrongs the business committed.

However, if the business is a sole proprietorship or a partnership, you may well be able to sue the owner(s) personally, alongside suing their business. This is advantageous, since the more people or entities you can sue, the greater your chance of collecting a judgment or settlement.

Scenario 4:
Can an Owner of an LLC Be Sued Personally?

Limits of Personal Liability Protection

No LLC or other legal business structure provides absolute protection for its owners from liabilities that may occur in connection with business operations. An LLC owner will be personally liable for his conduct that constitutes fraud or is illegal regardless of whether it is done in the context of operating his LLC's business. Similarly, an LLC owner who acts recklessly or negligently, such as being at fault in an auto accident while driving on company business, is liable for the property and personal injuries resulting from the accident. Any LLC owner who personally guarantees an LLC debt, such as a bank loan, will be personally liable to repay the debt if the LLC defaults on its payment.

Scenario 5:
Think Incorporating Will Protect Your Personal Assets? Not in These Cases.

Here are some of the situations where you will be personally liable for what happens in your corporation or LLC:

5. Your actions injure someone. If you provide a service to a customer (you’re a doctor, driver, consultant, tattoo artist, lawyer or accountant), you can be held personally liable for any claims of malpractice or negligence. For this reason, it’s critical to take out a robust professional-liability insurance policy to protect against malpractice or negligence claims. If your business has a general liability policy, be sure to check if it will protect you against these types of claims, as most don’t cover them.
 
Last edited:
From everything I've read, as long as you truly operate the business (in all forms) exclusive to itself with no overlap into your personal world, and you are running the business vs actually working (to protect you from fault), then you have a 99.9999999% chance of having no personal liability.

Again, I am no lawyer - nor do I play one on tv. I suspect it hard to believe that all this would be put out there by legal people if it wasn't true in some form.
 
"LLC" can benefit you...even if you have good insurance.
The LLC protects your personal assets from being included in a lawsuit of your business.
So they can't take your home or belongings.

That may be true, but if the liabilities aren't there an LLC is unnecessary.

General Liability and other policies are going to have limits between $2M and $6M which probably already greatly exceed the net worth of anyone looking to do DJ work as a part time job. They also likely to exceed the liabilities any given DJ is likely to incur.
 
And if the DJ WAS directly involved, they will go after everything you own - business and personal.

Not really.
They will go after the most accessible form of support which is your insurance policy and that is true no matter what your business form.
It is rare (probably unheard of) for a personally injury law suit against someone operating at the level of a mobile DJ to accumulate damages anywhere near the level that would force a lien against someone's home.
 
One of the things that has always been in my mind when thinking about this is to think of an event that would cause me to actually get sued. I can't come up with a situation that would be lawsuit worthy, where I wouldn't also be named personally as negligent. If you poorly set something up, working for a business, and someone gets hurt... the business may be at fault as the contractor, but the individual that caused the incident also has personal risk. So, to act as if my personal assets are sheltered hasn't ever felt real to me.

To be found "negligent" is a significantly higher legal bar to meet than to be found "liable." This is why insurance matters because without any you force the other side to reach higher.
 
There are no absolute rules about an LLC or S-Corp ability to protect you from personal liability, Ultimately - it's your personal actions that will determine that on a case by case basis.

If you are the sole principal and employee of an LLC or S-Corp then you won't personally be eligible for Workman's Comp because that's such an obvious avenue of fraud. You ARE required to have it in place for employees and uninsured contractors not matter what business form you take (including sole proprietors using sub-contractors as help.)

I don not see great benefit in an LLC to a part time sole proprietor DJ business. Properly assess your potential risk and insure appropriately.

A plaintiff cannot arbitrarily decide to go after your house, etc. They must pursue a specific substantiated damage award - and if they prevail you may have to liquidate assets including real estate to pay the judgement. You can avoid this by having BOTH the right kind of insurance and the right amount.

Many multi-ops are blind to a common liability that is NOT part of general business insurance. It pertains to sub-contractors doing gigs for you. You can not only be enjoined in a law suit when that sub-contractor gets in an auto accident while traveling or parked with respect to one of your gigs - but you may be pursued for losses incurred by his own insurance company even when his is the only car involved. For this you would also need coverage for "Business use of un-owned vehicles." When the sub-contractor's auto insurance company finds out he was on a job for you - they will turn around and sue you to recover any losses they paid out to anyone for any reason. So will the insurers of any other parties to the accident if those policies paid any losses.
 
Sorry, no. YOU screw up YOU get sued. Plain and simple.
YOU are liable for YOUR actions - always.

the example my attorney gave was say you have a dump truck and trailer. the trailer comes off and kills a family in a minivan (this happened here a couple of years back).

the driver is in deep do do - he's responsible for the vehicle and hitch as he's the operator.
PLUS the company gets sued as they have the overall liability for hiring and training and supplying the equipment. plus they hve the deep(er) pockets.


Well, you are not really applying common sense here. You're not wrong - but, in terms of liability 101 - you're also not at all correct.

No matter how you form your business - it is the insurance company that steps in to represent you regarding liability. An LLC alone will not provide a sole operator any protection if he fails to insure the operation.

Conceivably, you could own an uninsured and undeveloped piece of land somewhere as it's own LLC and that would protect your other properties or personal assets from liabilities arising out of that land. Any liability claim against the land would be limited to the asset value of that land. Undeveloped land is simple - it just sits there. You cannot extend this same line of thinking to an LLC that negotiates, travels, trades, performs, and interacts with other people, property, and a community with substantial risk.

If anyone believes you can negotiate a fee for labor, promise certain results, transport on the public ways and then load a pile of gear into a venue you do not own and think that an LLC formation alone limits your liability to the zero based appraisal of your sole DJ operation - it's time to get real.

An LLC alone can probably limit a tax liability owing to the business but, even there I think it would fail if the cause of the tax liability was fraud or non-compliance by a sole operator and you took the money out of the LLC. ???
 
Last edited:
LLC was a way for Doctors to protect other doctors in case of malpractice or being sued.

A doctor cannon form a true corporation and therefore avoid liability for his actions.

Say 3 doctors form a partnership and open a practice - one screws up and the other two go down with him. As an LLC that won't happen - only the dr that screwed up will go down in flames. It protects THE OTHER PEOPLE, not the 'bad actor'.

As the ONLY person in your biz..there is nobody else to protect yourself from. So it does very little to shield you from liability.

And the 'veil' is peirced almost from day 1 - form an LLC - it has no assets, no money, no credit. YOU do, not the LLC. So you're financially backing the LLC...

You COULD sell your gear TO the llc and hold the note/debt for it - probably many good tax reasons to do this, but few if anyone I know of does this. And remember that EVERYTHING must be in the LLC name - the website contract, your internet connection, your phone, etc - or else any lawyer, even one that finished last in his class, will easily shot your LLC to be a sham to sidestep responsibility (aka liability).


As for limitiing taxes..there are ways to do it but the IRS is clamping down on it. If you own the gear and LEASE it to your DJ LLC then pay yourself separately MAYBE you'll find a savings, a way to transfer the money with less tax liability.

But unless you making 50k or more it's likely to cost you more in accounting fees and paperwork than you're gonna save in taxes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Romard