Square Direct Invoicing - First Major Issue - Be Cautious!

To many ads? Support ODJT and see no ads!

Cap Capello

Always @ Ur Service
ODJT Supporter
Dec 14, 2006
3,835
4,098
80
Saratoga, NY
www.imadj.com
Square began an on-line invoicing program where a vendor can email a customer an invoice to be paid on-line. Unlike PayPal, the customer can use any credit card they choose, they do not need a Square account, and the fee is 2.75% and no transaction fees. Very cool and I jumped all over it.

Last December, an invoice was sent to a customer who made a significant purchase. The invoice was sent. Their card was accepted. The invoice was paid but not on the date it was sent. Funds were transferred. Product was shipped, delivered, and signed for.

In February, I get a notice from Square that a "customer" has started a fraudulent charge and I have to prove it was a legitimate charge including proof of delivery.

Here's the rub. Square will NOT tell you the customer's name and will provide only the last four digits of the card.

Problem #1: On that particular date, I sold three such items.
Problem #2: As the customer can use whatever card they wish (debit or credit or gift), I have no card information whatsoever, nor would I keep record of it once the funds have transferred (privacy policies).
Problem #3: Without a provided name or date or other pertinent identifying information, how am I supposed to know who was it and why?
Problem #4: Although Square's contact language was one of support and caring for me, it was all lip service. The onus was "Square-"ly on my shoulders.

After unresponsive begging for more details from Square, careful non-accusatory digging with the three customers revealed that one customer had made the purchase for a friend. The friend provided my customer with their credit card details and was used to make the purchase. When the friend of my customer's spouse received the card statement, my company name was not recognized, the purchase was not remembered, and a card fraud was started.

How the hell am I supposed to know all this if they won't tell me? Good thing for my law enforcement investigative background!!

It has been resolved.

Now, here's what I'm going to have to do in the future. Even though an invoice will still be sent, at the time of purchase I will have to ask what card will they be using, what is the name on the card, and what are the last four digits of the card. These details will be added to the invoice.

Is that enough data or should something else be added?
 
Good work Cap and thanks for the heads up. Other than the info you specify, I don't know what else you could collect. I say this because of the following (devils advocate of course) - if I decide at the last minute to use some other card (for whatever reason), then you'll end up in the same predicament.

I will say that it is sad that Square won't give you the info you need to defend a service they are providing for you.
 
I would contact Square to see if that data can be included on the invoice copies you receive.

That or change your descriptions to include a unique identifier.
 
They had an ID that didn't match anything of mine. When I called the three customers and asked if they had submitted a fraud report, all said no. When I asked if they used a card ending in the 4 digits Square gave me, they all said no. What narrowed it down was a second call to all three asking them if they got the product okay, was there a problem with it, did they use a card that someone else in their household may not be familiar with, and if not, what happened?

What needed to be considered was someone making a clandestine purchase, hidden from their significant other. Delicate waters, friends, very delicate.
 
Ouch that has to hurt. The more I dig into the e-commerce the more I find the merchant gets royally screwed one way or another when it comes to disputes and charge backs. Most people say consider it the cost of doing business but quite frankly that sucks. You hold up your end of the bargain and still run the risk of loosing money due to shysters or like your case a simple case of an uninformed spouse whether purposeful or not on part of the payer.

FWIW, when you invoice via PayPal, The invoicee can pay with any major credit card. They do not need a PayPal account. PayPal defaults to logging in with PayPal but there's an option to just pay with a credit card. One of my clients doesn't trust PayPal, yadda yadda and doesn't have an account but I still invoice him via PayPal and he pays me.

Google Wallet is an other option worth looking into. I carry a small balance with them. I could have swore they rolled out invoicing tools last year but cannot find them on the site now.
 
Last edited:
The first thing based on what you're saying I probably would not use the square invoicing and would stick with PayPal so it's a lot easier to track and if there's any sort of fraudulent reports PayPal is pretty good at following up.

Here at the hotel for third party credit card purchases where the card holder isn't here to present their card we use a form to collect their data and authorizing signature. This may be the way to go...
 
I use square invoice a lot. I find it very helpful. I've never had one challenged.

People tell me it's very convenient too.
 
I had a similar experience years ago with paypal credit card service and amex. With paypal YOU are not the merchant, PAYPAL is. What this means is Amex (and I assume mc/etc) will not talk with you, at all, in any way shape or form.

I had to get the customer to call amex and sort it out - so I was at the mercy of everyone else. (it was a case of forgotten charge also).
I'm hoping I don't have the issue with square - but again, square is the merchant, not me.
 
I swear to God the first look at this thread tonight I thought it said square dancing invoicing lol
 
Maybe this should be a separate thread but for those of you that swipe in person transactions how are you handling the EMV (chip) cards? The liability shift kicked in this October. Essentially, if you don't have a chip enabled reader you're on the hook if you just swipe an EMV card like you would a regular card and it turns out to be fraudulent. Prior to the liability shift in most situations the issuing bank had to eat fraudulent charges.

Here's a little more info about it on the Square site: What Is EMV? Everything You Need to Know About the Switch to Chip Cards

It looks like Square's reader is going to be $49 which really isn't bad at all. However, I do so few in person transactions that it's not worth the cost for me. It's easier for me just to email them an invoice when I get home.
 
I'm curious as to why it took the U.S so long to adopt chip card technology.
It has been the standard here north of the border for quite a number of years now.
From what I can tell the Canadian Square site doesn't even offer the chip reader for Canadian merchants and they are just now educating everyone on the U.S site about it.
 
I'm curious as to why it took the U.S so long to adopt chip card technology.
It has been the standard here north of the border for quite a number of years now.
From what I can tell the Canadian Square site doesn't even offer the chip reader for Canadian merchants and they are just now educating everyone on the U.S site about it.
In general people are cheap and lazy. The cards have to be more expensive to produce then a standard card. The re-education of consumers is expensive both in time and money. Merchants don't want to buy new card readers which may or may not interface properly with their existing and possibly ancient registers. If the new readers don't interface properly then you're looking at all new registers which can be a significant hit for a small to medium sized business.

The upgrade had to happen sooner or later. My guess would be that banks eating fraudulent charges became more expensive then rolling out the more secure system. I still think it should be chip and PIN like Europe vs. our chip and signature system. Nobody has once compared my signature to the signature on the back of the card (I never sign anyhow) or my driver's license. I don't sign for anything under $100 just initial or scribble - nobody balks. When I was a teenager I'd use my mother's cards regularly. I sure as hell don't look like an AnnMarie, nobody questioned it and this was when for the most part small businesses were still taking carbon imprints of the card and the merchant had to at least glance at the name.

For my .02, getting behind someone using a chip enabled card who doesn't know how to use it is just as bad as getting behind someone who's still writing checks. They almost always pull the card out to soon making them have to start the transaction all over again.
 
Last edited:
teh $49 fee (and it's more for some businesses) is 'rebated' off the first 3 months fees, so it could be free (if you do enough business). I ordered mine...you can also take applepay and such with it too.
I was told it would be in late fall...then a few weeks ago 'first quarter 2016'...they are out there for 'bigger' businesses (friend got one, $99 for him).
 
I still think it should be chip and PIN like Europe vs. our chip and signature system.

I didn't even notice that as I assumed that it would be chip and pin. Yeah, that is kinda pointless and I don't see how it will curb fraud then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Romard