Does that even make any frickin' sense? Why is this one 'more justified' - because in your mind, that's the most logical? They're ALL assumptions, period. This is why it needs to be clarified. Look at ALL the different assumptions we have collectively made.
And on the first day, the Lord said "let us READ and understand posts in their entirety before we *try* to assail them with multi-line quotes."
In my original post, if you would revisit, I already stated that the MOST IDEAL circumstance would be to get further clarification from the client, and that this assumption was merely the most reasonable given the information given by the OP and supposedly - the client themselves - when coupled with our collective experience.
There is a principle called Occam's razor being applied. Our collective experience as professionals would find "Brick House" and the phrase "songs like that" (when used to formulate a class for exclusions) to be representative of those very types of motivations and songs I listed - ie wanting to avoid the "tired out" and "played" out "cheezy" or "corny" songs. "Brick House" in particular gets lumped in with those songs and avoided for those reasons FAR more often than it gets excluded based on lyrical content or it's "sexually suggestive nature" which - let's face it - by today's standards, is completely tame and is outdone daily on the Nick network.
If lyrical content were an issue, it would have been stated as such. No one is going to give a *not even mildly* explicit song as a SPECIFIC example to rule out a class based on sexual content and "hope" the DJ gets it when they give the name of a milk-toast song and say "songs like that." That they were concerned about content would be manifested more explicitly, and any PARTICULAR song given to represent their concerns would be something that would be far more blatantly and easily discerned as being sexually explicit in nature. Furthermore, when an attempt to clarify their entirely unstated concern is made, they would not keep on with the vagueness. They would come around to stating their concern more explicitly to confirm that it was recognized and duly noted as such by the provider. Assuming the OP is giving an accurate accounting of their exchange, no one is going to play the types of convoluted word and mind games that would have to be played here on the part of the client to make their concerns known.
That makes lyrical content a FAR less probable motivation for the client, barring further info, which I had ALREADY STATED you should try to get, if at all possible.
So, any more choirs we care to preach to today? LOL
More telling and more helpful in sorting out which assumptions are more justified would be a peek at the client's must-play list, or desired songs for dancing. Any amount of money says there is stuff on there that would easily trump "Brick House" on content. Perhaps this information will be made available at a later date.