Just starting with "Digitization"

To many ads? Support ODJT and see no ads!
Little known AG feature -- after the rip, you click on the information (where the checksum is), and it will tell you if you had any issues. You should check each one you will be encoding after the WAV rip, prior to doing the encode to MP3... :)

Nice, thank you... Ill have to use that. I have found that when EAC completely hangs on ripping a WAV (not just stutters or needs to go back) that AG usually rips it without a problem.
 
And I know Tag & Rename was mentioned above, but I have tried it and the results (specifically for GENRE) were really hokey and inconsistent.

Is there any app that is more reliable or consistent (GENRE) than Tag & Rename, Zortam, and the other major biggies? I even tried one called Tidy Songs that piggybacks on iTunes, and it was garbage as well.

I suppose I should just start doing the GENRE tags manually as I rip them... doesn't seem like there's any real consistent source so far for automated genre tagging?

Thanks!
 
Random thoughts and comments:

I've used both CDex and AG for ripping my CD's.

I've used both VBR and CBR MP3's, and preferred VBR for a long time because of the smaller file size. I moved on to 320kbps CBR files a short time back for all my cd rips. My online purchases vary in bitrate but the lowest is 192kbps vbr.

Why the various bitrates?
There was a double blind studying whose results showed that 192kbps vbr MP3's were indistinguishable from the original source material. That being said, I consider that the MINIMUM acceptable bit rate for MUSICAL material (spoken word tracks, like audio books is a completely different concept altogether). With the elevated noise floor at most events coupled with the distractions, I doubt most people could even tell the difference between 128kbps cbr and source material, but there is a point of diminishing returns in regards to size vs. sound quality. If you want to do your own 'double blind' study - try using an ABX comparator with various bitrates. You might just be surprised with the results. ;)

Most playback devices don't have a problem with VBR, but on battery powered devices it will eat your battery marginally faster because of the additional processing overhead. The same is true of DRM enabled tracks.

Given the size of modern storage devices, it's best to use the highest bitrate possible. If you are using the tracks during working out, etc - you can use a lower bitrate because it's more 'distraction' than 'sound quality' you're concerned with. That's why products like the Shuffle are popular with people working out despite their smaller capacity.

As for using wavs, there are better alternatives with smaller files that support tagging. FLAC, lossless AAC, and a few others are supported by 'most' playback devices in one form or another. As always, double check before ripping everything and then realizing it doesn't work.

If you have the room, keep the wavs so you can move to another format later if you need to.

As was already mentioned, use the LAME encoder over Blade and the original Fraunhoffer algorithms. It produces a better sounding file at comparable bitrates than the others.


That's the key items I've remembered off the top of my head... some was already covered, some might not have been. But I hope it helps someone.
 
And I know Tag & Rename was mentioned above, but I have tried it and the results (specifically for GENRE) were really hokey and inconsistent.

Genre is really up to you -- there's no real way for a program to figure that out, since it is so subjective, and there is no definitive standard.

I do it in AG when I rip, which appends it to the WAV file for future use encoding.

The consistency I get, is only relative to my interpretation -- in my library, you may not find what you're looking for under genre, because I may have tagged it differently...


You'd be surprised, I get calls from customers who say they can't find their files under such and such genre in my software. So I ask them what they tagged them as when they ripped them. The usual answer -- I got them off Limewire, or my friend copied his drive for me... :sqerr:



Anyway, I know it's time consuming, but I listen to each and every track I encode, all the way through. While doing that, I check all tag attributes, and make any adjustments as necessary. It's a lot of work, but if done properly, and backed up a lot, it will last you a lifetime :)
 
Random thoughts and comments:

Again, they won't let you hit 'Thanks' twice for a post, so thanks again.. great post.

Yeah that's pretty much where I'm at - a combo of the two methods - 320cbr for the 'DJ Essentials,' or stuff that is accessed all the time or quite often and 192vbr for the rest that is accessed little, if at all.

I may regret not doing 320 across the board later-on, but that's where I've decided to start!
 
@ Rick

Yeah, if I want to have it done Im gonna have to go back and do it manually to correspond with my format and start doing it per-disc-ripped like you said - if I want it done at all.

I'm not even sure it will be beneficial to me honestly because I never search things by genre anyway... just by artist or title. Genre designations only come into play at all in printing or sorting lists for clients, or for my client request-book, which will be maintained separately as well, so barring someone coming up with a REALLY compelling reason to do genre tags I might just let it go for now - but that's lame anyway... let's just face it - I'm lazy! :sqlaugh:
 
@Sounds,

Not so much for searching, but for sorting, I use genre mostly.


For example, I've got the crowd captivated with a song, but not sure where to go with the mix, but I know the song falls into a particular genre I've established and tagged.

Rather than scroll through endless songs, if I did my genre homework up front, I can quickly scroll through a small list of songs that might match up well with what they're digging at the moment.


I don't look at BPM or many other factors -- I try to take the song in play into context, using the genre, lyrics, and the way the crowd reacts to certain things within the song. I equate genre with the "feeling" of the song. For example... Margaritaville == beach party. What else fits in that genre -- maybe Kokomo and other songs from the Cocktail soundtrack, La Isla Bonita, Uncle John From Jamaica, etc.


I try my best, to put myself into the crowds head at the moment, and genre works best for me :)
 
@Sounds,

Not so much for searching, but for sorting, I use genre mostly.


For example, I've got the crowd captivated with a song, but not sure where to go with the mix, but I know the song falls into a particular genre I've established and tagged.

Rather than scroll through endless songs, if I did my genre homework up front, I can quickly scroll through a small list of songs that might match up well with what they're digging at the moment.


I don't look at BPM or many other factors -- I try to take the song in play into context, using the genre, lyrics, and the way the crowd reacts to certain things within the song. I equate genre with the "feeling" of the song. For example... Margaritaville == beach party. What else fits in that genre -- maybe Kokomo and other songs from the Cocktail soundtrack, La Isla Bonita, Uncle John From Jamaica, etc.


I try my best, to put myself into the crowds head at the moment, and genre works best for me :)

I remember reading somewhere that a good DJ has to have 'one foot on the dancefloor'.

The problem is how many genre's do you have, and how do you tag songs that fall into multiple categories/genre's? ;)
 
@Sounds,

Not so much for searching, but for sorting, I use genre mostly.


For example, I've got the crowd captivated with a song, but not sure where to go with the mix, but I know the song falls into a particular genre I've established and tagged.

Rather than scroll through endless songs, if I did my genre homework up front, I can quickly scroll through a small list of songs that might match up well with what they're digging at the moment.


I don't look at BPM or many other factors -- I try to take the song in play into context, using the genre, lyrics, and the way the crowd reacts to certain things within the song. I equate genre with the "feeling" of the song. For example... Margaritaville == beach party. What else fits in that genre -- maybe Kokomo and other songs from the Cocktail soundtrack, La Isla Bonita, Uncle John From Jamaica, etc.


I try my best, to put myself into the crowds head at the moment, and genre works best for me :)

Even if you do have your songs tagged to a genre, it could easily be much more of list than you want to look thru. Beach party is a good example for Rick here because it's not going to be a large list, but take a second and think about your classic rock collection. How large of a list would that be if you had it all tagged as classic rock and pulled those songs up, then you have to filter thru all the stuff that was just filler music on an album.

That's why I like creating 'Best of Series'....so, I've went thru my library of beach party music and scaled it down to the best of the best within beach party music. I can go directly to that folder and quickly pull a song from that genre.
 
Yeah I go by associations too. I flip through discs in sleeves to find my "inspiration/muse" unless I had something in the front of my mind or a request that fit perfectly, so I'm thinking about keeping my collection sorted according to the same schema... ie, all my Funk/Old Skool compilations will just be tracks dumped into one folder. 50's compilations in the 50's folder, 60's into the 60's, etc. So obviously songs from artists will span different folders as well depending on the disc that originated the track and its general theme.

All that hardwiring for making associations and building sets with my existing library is already there, and I don't know that changing navigation entirely simply because I'm changing formats is necessary, or even beneficial.

I don't typically need as much visual help building genre sets as I do making the transitions between them, which is why I say that genre tags may or may not be a god-send up-front. But I'll be kicking myself later if I don't do the legwork now I suppose.

My genres internally are pretty straight-forward:

Rock/Pop
Country
Soul/R&B
Hip-Hop/Rap
Disco
Funk/Old Skool
Big Band
Popular Stds

Then:

Novelty
Ethnic (with subfolders)
Hawaiian/Caribbean (with specified subfolders)
Etc.

As a rule, I've built my DJ library without albums - using most all compilations and Best-ofs, so sorting through filler-songs usually isn't an issue. All the songs in the library were enough of a stand-out for the artist to make it into those to begin with.
 
My genres internally are pretty straight-forward:

Rock/Pop
Country
Soul/R&B
Hip-Hop/Rap
Disco
Funk/Old Skool
Big Band
Popular Stds

Then:

Novelty
Ethnic (with subfolders)
Hawaiian/Caribbean (with specified subfolders)
Etc.

So, if someone wants Herpes, you go to the "popular stds"?! :sqeek:

Not that it's right or wrong, another way to do "beach party" or any kind of theme is simply playlisting. That way you can have any song in multiple lists, to use whenever and however you choose.
 
So, if someone wants Herpes, you go to the "popular stds"?! :sqeek:

Not that it's right or wrong, another way to do "beach party" or any kind of theme is simply playlisting. That way you can have any song in multiple lists, to use whenever and however you choose.

:yoOMG::yoDur:yorofl:yorofl:
 
see attached pics for easy cd-da extractor

love it when its simple and all done for you

pic 1 and pic 2 shows crc errors if it happens and does it on the fly
 

Attachments

  • ripping using easy cd-da extrator #1.jpg
    ripping using easy cd-da extrator #1.jpg
    128 KB · Views: 6
  • ripping using easy cd-da extrator #2.jpg
    ripping using easy cd-da extrator #2.jpg
    133.2 KB · Views: 3
I am new at this to annd ant to know how you rip to a wav file or MP3. How can you tell the difference? Sorry, this going digital is a little greek. I don't want to spend a lot of time doing it wrong. I have itunes now. I saw on one thread that you can use it. DO you file by all songs together and then sort by artist. Do you make folers for each artist?
 
I am new at this to annd ant to know how you rip to a wav file or MP3. How can you tell the difference? Sorry, this going digital is a little greek. I don't want to spend a lot of time doing it wrong. I have itunes now. I saw on one thread that you can use it. DO you file by all songs together and then sort by artist. Do you make folers for each artist?

You've been asking the same questions all over this board and several people myself included has pointed you in the right direction over and over again... All you need to know is on this page... download both Audiograbber and the Lame mp3 Encoder and follow this tutorial:

http://www.softjock.com/mp3ripping.htm
 
So does anyone here gig using a lappy alone - keys and mouse - without the aid of an external controller device/unit?

Pros? Cons?

Nope can't stand doing it with just a mouse and keyboard... I was forever stopping my music everytime I wanted to search for anything with an "S" in it.... very agravating... not to mention having to do mental gymnastics to remember what F'n key did what.... nope a controller works best for me and best of all it's labled as to what button does what... no guess work and best of all no need to do mental arobics...
 
I on the other hand utilize and love using my mouse & keyboard.

Rob - sounds like you had 'S' set up as a hotkey....can't really do that. ;)

No mental gymnastics for me. It just take some practice, just like using any other piece of equipment in your arsenal.
 
Any Experience with this laptop?

I found someone who is willing to give a great deal on a machine, but I am concerned about a potential issue it may have.

HP zd7000

3.2ghz HT P4

1 GB RAM

80 gig hard drive

17" widescreen

DVDRW burner

4 USB/1 Firewire

Sounds great on the spec-side, and all the industry-mag reviews I found for it were killer, but when I start reading user reviews I find it has issues with getting too hot, overheating & shutting down. Something about a bad chip on the graphics card that overheats and fry's the motherboard? Some have said there was a recall on certain runs of the model.

Anyone have experience with this beast? Issues?

Obviously just starting out and going into wedding season with gigs outside and temps in the 100's, I can't have a machine that is prone to running hot - let alone frying itself!

Thanks.