Windows 8 to Windows 7

To many ads? Support ODJT and see no ads!
Carry on man, carry on!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
It is very interesting that the ones on here who really DJ for a living do not have a problem with some of the things I post.
Perhaps they're just tired of the crap, and don't wish to beat a dead horse.

It is always the Hobbyists who want to post things that they do THEIR way and bristle when it is pointed out that the real DJ world does not operate that way.
The "real" DJ world INCLUDES the part time guys, too. That's why it's a WORLD and not a SMALL GROUP. A world has people of all different colors and sizes, who don't all speak the same language, don't eat the same foods, and don't all do things the same way.


I point out things because there are new people on here all the time and therefore they should get to know the other options.
If we are not allowed to post how we do things OUR way (see above) then how will the new people see any OTHER options other than YOURS?

If what you all are proposing is that "You do things your way and I will do things my way", what then is the purpose of coming onto the Forum?
So we can all see how OTHERS do things differently. THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF A FORUM!

That is like someone connecting the negative conductor of the speaker cable to the Positive Terminal of an amplifier and telling you it has always worked for them. Should one not correct that person and show/tell them the correct way of hooking up the cables?
Actual scientific standards and the laws of physics are definite. How you can compare that to someone's preferences?
(yes, someone's choice to use iTunes is a PREFERENCE!)


Why have to sugar coat and dance around the issue. I am a straightforward speaker, I do not like sugar coating anything (except the Redhead)
No one expects you to. But we do expect that you value others opinions, as we value yours. If it's not your way of doing things, so be it.
If you believe it is not the way the "DJ world" operates. SO BE IT! You are not here to force people to change, you are here to offer your side of the story...and let them decide.


DJ Software was made for DJs, iTunes was not designed for DJs, period. If one does not know how to customize their DJ software to perform their tasks and have to resort to iTunes to do it for them, oh well!
YES! "oh well"....you just said it! Stop arguing over someone's opinions that do not agree with yours. Just say "Oh well.." and move on!

Don't you guys get down on people for using Media formats that you say is inferior such as a file that is a Wav vs a file that is a 128 bit rate? What if I told you that it does not matter to the clients, that the file would still play regardless of which one is used? Those who know better will tell you to use the Wav. This is no different to what I am proposing here with the iTunes method vs the DJ Software method.
I beg to differ. Sound quality and file storage folders are two different things. Stop using the "It's just like" comparisons.

So why all the fuss?
Because YOU make a fuss about it.

Okay.
You can agree to disagree....
or you can make this thread drag on for another 3 pages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
In addition, the way you do things does not make them the correct way. They are YOUR way - adopted from elsewhere or otherwise. I would like to take the credit for things that I do but others have come before me and no it is not my way, it is the correct way on certain standards.



So shake your head - they are tools in the toolbox. The purpose of this forum is NOT to listen to what Canute says is the gospel. It IS to share and collaborate on a multitude of things. You make it a one way conversation and turn it into 'you do things your way and I'll do them mine'. If that s how you feel, then what can I say!



This is NOT like the scenario described above - TOTALLY different scenario. Using the scenario above, I know of no experienced person here that would do such a thing. You would be surprised the kinds of methods out there. I went to visit a new Karaoke Show last week. It was a a Bar that holds about 100, pretty small. The KJ had two QSC K 10s, one was pointed to the audience and the other was on the floor pointed towards the Singer. Of course I shook my head. I went up to the Couple and asked them to see the settings (They were using the same Karaoke Software that I do). When the Guy opened the settings, it confirmed my fears, yep they were running their output in Stereo. The point is that others see this and think it is the way to do things. Plain and simple, what they were doing was WRONG. It is not a matter of my way, it is wrong!



iTunes is a tool that MAY be used. The vendors of some of this 'DJ software' will even tell you ways to use iTunes to benefit your sw experience. Are they also not developing products in a proper manner? Software vendors may include the ability to read iTunes and its folders. They are in the market to sell their product to anyone, even wannabees. The more stuff they include that will appeal to more people, the more product will be sold.



Again, TOTALLY different discussion! iTunes can manage and read tags on media just as good as any other product out there. Are we suggesting using iTunes for DJing? Absolutely not! Now if you can pull off a successful show mixing and everything else you need to do using multiple systems with iTunes, who am I to knock you down. You CAN hear a difference between low and high bit rates of a song. Would it matter to the client? Possibly. If you are using 2 systems, both with iTunes, and there are no flaws - how would the client know any different?

Am I suggesting someone try this - absolutely not. Could it be done, absolutely. I'm certain it probably has. This comes back to having multiple ways to accomplish the same task. You should ALWAYS have tools in the toolbox.
Some answers in red. Make sure you have the right tools for the job, not just any tools. I can run Zip Cord wires to my speakers but it does not mean I should. However I would definitely not recommend it to anyone or lead them to believe its is an option. It should not!

What I do get is, if I say "Black" you guys say "White", if I say "Up" you guys say "down". If you don't like what I post or don't want to follow then just shut up and do your thing! Don't prolong the discussion.
 
In addition, the way you do things does not make them the correct way. They are YOUR way - adopted from elsewhere or otherwise. I would like to take the credit for things that I do but others have come before me and no it is not my way, it is the correct way on certain standards. Hence why they are adopted from elsewhere - because YOU use them, they are YOUR way. My way isn't my way because I invented it. We all have ways we have learned to do things from others or from our own experiences. This collection is YOUR way. By not claiming it as your way, is this how you get around being blamed if it didn't work?

So shake your head - they are tools in the toolbox. The purpose of this forum is NOT to listen to what Canute says is the gospel. It IS to share and collaborate on a multitude of things. You make it a one way conversation and turn it into 'you do things your way and I'll do them mine'. If that s how you feel, then what can I say! There is nothing you can say - but you can see the evidence on this site alone. This is not my opinion alone. It's up to you to change the perception you give people. Maybe it's time to look in the mirror. This is a site to share. If you want a site where everything you say is Gospel, then sponsor your own sub forum (Danno could use the money) .. or open your own site.

This is NOT like the scenario described above - TOTALLY different scenario. Using the scenario above, I know of no experienced person here that would do such a thing. You would be surprised the kinds of methods out there. I went to visit a new Karaoke Show last week. It was a a Bar that holds about 100, pretty small. The KJ had two QSC K 10s, one was pointed to the audience and the other was on the floor pointed towards the Singer. Of course I shook my head. I went up to the Couple and asked them to see the settings (They were using the same Karaoke Software that I do). When the Guy opened the settings, it confirmed my fears, yep they were running their output in Stereo. The point is that others see this and think it is the way to do things. Plain and simple, what they were doing was WRONG. It is not a matter of my way, it is wrong! Again, this has NOTHING to do with the topic at hand. This was also your firsthand experience with one person in a specific venue. That does not apply to all.


iTunes is a tool that MAY be used. The vendors of some of this 'DJ software' will even tell you ways to use iTunes to benefit your sw experience. Are they also not developing products in a proper manner? Software vendors may include the ability to read iTunes and its folders. They are in the market to sell their product to anyone, even wannabees. The more stuff they include that will appeal to more people, the more product will be sold. For the price of some of this SW, I doubt it's targeted to 'wannabees'.

Again, TOTALLY different discussion! iTunes can manage and read tags on media just as good as any other product out there. Are we suggesting using iTunes for DJing? Absolutely not! Now if you can pull off a successful show mixing and everything else you need to do using multiple systems with iTunes, who am I to knock you down. You CAN hear a difference between low and high bit rates of a song. Would it matter to the client? Possibly. If you are using 2 systems, both with iTunes, and there are no flaws - how would the client know any different?

Am I suggesting someone try this - absolutely not. Could it be done, absolutely. I'm certain it probably has. This comes back to having multiple ways to accomplish the same task. You should ALWAYS have tools in the toolbox.

Some answers in red. Make sure you have the right tools for the job, not just any tools. I can run Zip Cord wires to my speakers but it does not mean I should. However I would definitely not recommend it to anyone or lead them to believe its is an option. It should not!

What I do get is, if I say "Black" you guys say "White", if I say "Up" you guys say "down". If you don't like what I post or don't want to follow then just shut up and do your thing! Don't prolong the discussion.

Some answers in blue. What you don't get is that if you changed the way people perceive you - and your stance on your adopted ways being the only ones right - they might say you know what, it really is the same color he says it is. All you're doing is getting people to NOT want to participate. If you want someone to see the same color, you have to make them want to see it too. All you're doing lately is putting up walls.
 
For Mike (Ausumm): There is a Big Difference between a Hobbyist and a Part Time DJ that views what he does as a business. There are many successful Part Timers on here as well as full timers.
For Mike (ittiger) : When one studies Electronics or whatever Subjects, the Professor's role is not to teach the students any old which way. His job is to teach the Correct way. maybe you should go out and visit Bars, Clubs and other DJ shows to see what others are doing to learn not just what to do but also what not to do. You are telling me that if I get training to do something that is a tried and proven system/method that it becomes MY Way! What have you been smoking?
 
I know a hobbyist on this board!!

NO NAMES AS HE KNOWS!!!
 
For Mike (ittigger) : When one studies Electronics or whatever Subjects, the Professor's role is not to teach the students any old which way. His job is to teach the Correct way. maybe you should go out and visit Bars, Clubs and other DJ shows to see what others are doing to learn not just what to do but also what not to do. You are telling me that if I get training to do something that is a tried and proven system/method that it becomes MY Way! What have you been smoking?

A teacher teaches what is known as 'A' correct way - it is not 'THE' correct way. Go ask any teacher you know if what they teach is the only correct way to do something. When one is a teacher, he / she is also receptive to learn from those that he / she is in company with. Also, who are you claiming to teach if no one here listens to you and if no newbies come in asking for advice or wanting to partake in our forums? A good teacher knows their limits, knows when to back off and knows when to learn. That same teacher also has no problems getting people to come to them for advice nor with people discussing, weighing and accepting said advice.

I am telling you that the 'tried / proven system' that you use is not the ONLY way to do something. It is the way you were taught, it is the way you have adopted to do it and it is the way you do it now (currently, I imagine some of these have your own personal modifications) - therefore it is YOUR way. It is not THE universal correct way. By that token, my teacher taught me how to do most of the things I do as well, using tried / proven ways and methods - so I hate to break it to you - but mine are THE correct ways. They are however, in conflict with yours. HOLY BATMAN, can there be two "THE correct ways"? Could there be more?

I'm a well educated person as well - and I also know that the things you are taught are fundamentals. They may not apply to each situation and there may be more than one way to arrive at the same destination. Is 95 the ONLY way to get from Maine to Florida?

Because we're speaking of computers at this specific point and you LOVE to bring up your diploma's, education and training, do you have certifications that enable you to speak about this intelligently?

FWIW, I regularly visit with other DJ's and see what they do and how they do it. I am very much in touch with what is going on. Sounds like you are the one that needs to do some visiting. Instead of being a wallflower, why don't you try to make friends with them. I wonder how receptive they would be if you approached them as you do here.

In addition, I don't smoke - but thanks for asking.

;)

I state again that what you don't get is that if you changed the way people perceive you - and your stance on your adopted ways being the only ones right - they might say you know what, it really is the same color he says it is. All you're doing is getting people to NOT want to participate. If you want someone to see the same color, you have to make them want to see it too. All you're doing lately is putting up walls.

Updated: I'd also like to say that claiming the way you do things as not your way could be seen as disrespectful to those that taught you. I'm proud of my history and the people that taught me / I've learned from - and the way I do things is MY way (which is the way I was taught with my flavor added).
 
Last edited:
If one way is faster and more efficient, yet both accomplish the same thing -- which would you use...?

He hasn't said nor proven that anything is any faster or more efficient than anything anyone else does. All he's doing is saying his way (that he's also claiming is not his) is the correct way. If I can do something but it's not efficient for me (regardless of how efficient it is in reality), how efficient is it really?

Alot of this probably also depends on what you use and how you use it - so how can someone not there explicitly state that 'A' is the correct way?

The fastest and most efficient way for me to use your computer is to crack / reset your password. Is that the method I should use?

Canute openly stated that he uses DJ software tags in addition to browsing to the folder - which are part of the same tools I use, yet I'm not using my system properly. Being that we're using similar tools, should I assume that he also does not know how to use his system properly?
 
Last edited:
He hasn't said nor proven that anything is any faster or more efficient than anything anyone else does. All he's doing is saying his way (that he's also claiming is not his) is the correct way. If I can do something but it's not efficient for me (regardless of how efficient it is in reality), how efficient is it really?
Go back to the beginning and read. Maybe then you will comprehend. Nowhere was I claiming anything to be My Way. I started out by saying that iTunes methods for Organizing files was way to tedious that you end up with a Gazillion Genres and layers of folders/directories/sub directories. You and Steve are the ones that are claiming it was my way. By using that Buzz Phrase you know you will have others siding with you against me and what i have to say. I also never said iTunes was the wrong way. What I was proposing was that the DJ software was more superior to just allowing iTunes to automatically sort and organize the Files.
 
Go back to the beginning and read. Maybe then you will comprehend. Nowhere was I claiming anything to be My Way. I started out by saying that iTunes methods for Organizing files was way to tedious that you end up with a Gazillion Genres and layers of folders/directories/sub directories. You and Steve are the ones that are claiming it was my way. By using that Buzz Phrase you know you will have others siding with you against me and what i have to say. I also never said iTunes was the wrong way. What I was proposing was that the DJ software was more superior to just allowing iTunes to automatically sort and organize the Files.

Now I can't comprehend - nice.

You have been asked what is superior about reading tags, sorting and organizing in iTunes vs anything else. You have yet to answer. You also haven't proven anything about anything. So if nothing is different, why all the fuss from you?

The 'your way' is coming from you insisting that your way of doing things is 'THE' way to do them. You may have been schooled to do something in a certain manner - but that is by far the only way to do it. In fact, the taught way is often times the most tedious way - as shown in my example, I can reset / crack your password way faster than it would take me to get access to your system properly / correctly - and it's more efficient. Do you think the reset / crack is part of the lesson?

What you have been oblivious to is that iTunes, like any other product, will do explicitly what you allow / tell it to. If you want it to index in place, it will. If you want multiple Genre's, you can set it up to do that, if you want one Genre, it can do that too. As with DJ sw, all of this has little to do with the software and everything to do with how you tag things. This is part of the reason that I don't do any autotagging.

Also, if anyone is picking sides, it's not because of my saying of anything. It might have everything to do with that castle and moat you're building. I do like you're lack of claiming anything though. I might adopt that - could come in handy someday.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
He hasn't said nor proven that anything is any faster or more efficient than anything anyone else does. All he's doing is saying his way (that he's also claiming is not his) is the correct way. If I can do something but it's not efficient for me (regardless of how efficient it is in reality), how efficient is it really?

Alot of this probably also depends on what you use and how you use it - so how can someone not there explicitly state that 'A' is the correct way?


No, I'm not saying whatever works for you is not good -- that's up to you.

But as a developer, I do my best to make things more efficient. That's the whole purpose of writing DJ software -- make it easier and faster, for the user to do his/her task, and not have to use the OS.

When I first started DJ'ing, I had a turntable and 8-track player. You had to keep your records and tapes organized. So when I started writing the DJ software some 13-14 years ago, I got my pad and pen out, and diagrammed how the process worked -- flow chart. What I found, was that at the last few seconds of a song, you might change your mind based on crowd response, to what you wanted to play next.

Hence the need for speed and efficiency. I could browse through folders if I wanted, but it takes too long.


As for Canute -- well, he's Canute -- I can't make him more efficient, not my job :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
No, I'm not saying whatever works for you is not good -- that's up to you.

But as a developer, I do my best to make things more efficient. That's the whole purpose of writing DJ software -- make it easier and faster, for the user to do his/her task, and not have to use the OS.

When I first started DJ'ing, I had a turntable and 8-track player. You had to keep your records and tapes organized. So when I started writing the DJ software some 13-14 years ago, I got my pad and pen out, and diagrammed how the process worked -- flow chart. What I found, was that at the last few seconds of a song, you might change your mind based on crowd response, to what you wanted to play next.

Hence the need for speed and efficiency. I could browse through folders if I wanted, but it takes too long.


As for Canute -- well, he's Canute -- I can't make him more efficient, not my job :laugh:

TOTALLY AGREE!!!! (on a side note, we've already had this discussion - the whole basic user / advanced user thing).
 
Just curious Curt -- why would you even bother putting that many songs on your HDD?

Yer gonna play maybe 3 of those songs. And if we do the math, what does it cost you per year (and wasted space and search indexing time) for all that wasted stuff that you will never play?
You never know what song you may need at a gig. I was a boy scout and their model was be prepared. At least he'll have him if he needs it. Also the Windows 8 thing just goes to show that new is not always better. Sometimes good old tried and true works much better then new.
 
TOTALLY AGREE!!!! (on a side note, we've already had this discussion - the whole basic user / advanced user thing).


Agree back.

You don't even wanna know some of the people I deal with. It actually cracks me up sometimes. I get a phone call for example, and they ask how do I put my music in the library. Well, you could either read the manual, or just click on the Tools menu, and Add Music, Set Watch folders, things like that.

Sometimes, you really have to ponder the IQ's of people out there. Did their mother drink heavily when she was prego, or did they do better drugs than I did...?


This is why I drink -- because they will annoy my sorry ass with stupid questions (that should be common sense for somebody using a computer).


Wedding season is coming up -- so I'm gonna have to get more beer... :cheers:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
It is very interesting that the ones on here who really DJ for a living do not have a problem with some of the things I post. Some things you post make sense, others do not, so "some" is accurate. It is always the Hobbyists who want to post things that they do THEIR way and bristle when it is pointed out that the real DJ world does not operate that way. I point out things because there are new people on here all the time and therefore they should get to know the other options. As Tig and others have said .. that is what a chat board is for. And I bristle because the "real world" does operate this way. And honestly, you have not given even 1 piece of evidence that what I shared was an incorrect way of doing things. The fact that you were trained in a different methodology before iTunes existed, or maybe before computers did, is moot .. just another way.

When I hear of so called DJs who have a DJ Software but use Windows Media or Winamp to run music for a Cocktail Hour I have to shake my head. So running cocktail hour music on a Pioneer MEP is substantially different as you have stated you have done? Do they really don't know that the DJ software can run two or more Playlists? If what you all are proposing is that "You do things your way and I will do things my way", what then is the purpose of coming onto the Forum? I agree .. what is the purpose if I can't propose my way, which works, and you have yet to find anything wrong with except to continue to say "toy".

That is like someone connecting the negative conductor of the speaker cable to the Positive Terminal of an amplifier and telling you it has always worked for them. Should one not correct that person and show/tell them the correct way of hooking up the cables? Why have to sugar coat and dance around the issue. I am a straightforward speaker, I do not like sugar coating anything (except the Redhead) But, unlike connecting a speaker to the wong terminal, there is no RIGHT way to rip songs, no "right" way to manage songs, and no right way to DJ songs.

DJ Software was made for DJs, iTunes was not designed for DJs, period. Neither are dollar store consumer cables, and yet they work. If one does not know how to customize their DJ software to perform their tasks and have to resort to iTunes to do it for them, oh well! :rolleyes: Again, different tools .. I do not have 1 DJ app (and I have a bunch .. VDJ, PCDJ, Serato, and Rockit) that allow you to rip cds .. so somewhere, one needs tools .. whether to rip, equalize loudness, tag, or manage files .. we need tools. iTunes is a tool that works and for those of us that have idevices, works just fine.

Don't you guys get down on people for using Media formats that you say is inferior such as a file that is a Wav vs a file that is a 128 bit rate? What if I told you that it does not matter to the clients, that the file would still play regardless of which one is used? Those who know better will tell you to use the Wav. This is no different to what I am proposing here with the iTunes method vs the DJ Software method. So why all the fuss? What DJ method? I don't see it in the ADJA rules. I don't see them posted on the DJ application websites. WHERE are these rules of which you speak? WHERE?

I just got back, so some retorts in red.

- - - Updated - - -

Go back to the beginning and read. Maybe then you will comprehend. Nowhere was I claiming anything to be My Way. I started out by saying that iTunes methods for Organizing files was way to tedious that you end up with a Gazillion Genres and layers of folders/directories/sub directories. You and Steve are the ones that are claiming it was my way. By using that Buzz Phrase you know you will have others siding with you against me and what i have to say. I also never said iTunes was the wrong way. What I was proposing was that the DJ software was more superior to just allowing iTunes to automatically sort and organize the Files.

You were claiming it to be the "standard" way and that you followed the "standard, which makes it your way. And again, it is apparent you do not know anything about the application, as iTunes creates an Artist directory and then a sub directory for Album .. no gazillion anythings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Windows 8 still working fine for me.

i have not worried about what folder I store my music in in years. I put it in a folder, any folder, my software reads it and now knows where it's at if I need it. I only starts another folder if one gets too big.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
DJ Software was made for DJs, iTunes was not designed for DJs, period.

Remember we have newbies looking at these threads and they need to know the correct way not just any way.

Hobbyists with their toys handle things their own way, eh!

True DJs do not use iTunes. That is for novices!

okay...

I also never said iTunes was the wrong way.

You are correct, you never SAID it was the wrong way. But you sure did come REAL close.

By using that Buzz Phrase you know you will have others siding with you against me and what i have to say.

If people are siding against you....it is NOT because of Steve, Tigger, or because of anything they said or any "buzz words" they used.
And it's not even "siding against you"....it's called disagreeing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people