It is very interesting that the ones on here who really DJ for a living do not have a problem with some of the things I post.
Perhaps they're just tired of the crap, and don't wish to beat a dead horse.
It is always the Hobbyists who want to post things that they do THEIR way and bristle when it is pointed out that the real DJ world does not operate that way.
The "real" DJ world INCLUDES the part time guys, too. That's why it's a WORLD and not a SMALL GROUP. A world has people of all different colors and sizes, who don't all speak the same language, don't eat the same foods, and don't all do things the same way.
I point out things because there are new people on here all the time and therefore they should get to know the other options.
If we are not allowed to post how we do things OUR way (see above) then how will the new people see any OTHER options other than YOURS?
If what you all are proposing is that "You do things your way and I will do things my way", what then is the purpose of coming onto the Forum?
So we can all see how OTHERS do things differently. THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF A FORUM!
That is like someone connecting the negative conductor of the speaker cable to the Positive Terminal of an amplifier and telling you it has always worked for them. Should one not correct that person and show/tell them the correct way of hooking up the cables?
Actual scientific standards and the laws of physics are definite. How you can compare that to someone's preferences?
(yes, someone's choice to use iTunes is a PREFERENCE!)
Why have to sugar coat and dance around the issue. I am a straightforward speaker, I do not like sugar coating anything (except the Redhead)
No one expects you to. But we do expect that you value others opinions, as we value yours. If it's not your way of doing things, so be it.
If you believe it is not the way the "DJ world" operates. SO BE IT! You are not here to force people to change, you are here to offer your side of the story...and let them decide.
DJ Software was made for DJs, iTunes was not designed for DJs, period. If one does not know how to customize their DJ software to perform their tasks and have to resort to iTunes to do it for them, oh well!
YES! "oh well"....you just said it! Stop arguing over someone's opinions that do not agree with yours. Just say "Oh well.." and move on!
Don't you guys get down on people for using Media formats that you say is inferior such as a file that is a Wav vs a file that is a 128 bit rate? What if I told you that it does not matter to the clients, that the file would still play regardless of which one is used? Those who know better will tell you to use the Wav. This is no different to what I am proposing here with the iTunes method vs the DJ Software method.
I beg to differ. Sound quality and file storage folders are two different things. Stop using the "It's just like" comparisons.
So why all the fuss?
Because YOU make a fuss about it.
Some answers in red. Make sure you have the right tools for the job, not just any tools. I can run Zip Cord wires to my speakers but it does not mean I should. However I would definitely not recommend it to anyone or lead them to believe its is an option. It should not!In addition, the way you do things does not make them the correct way. They are YOUR way - adopted from elsewhere or otherwise. I would like to take the credit for things that I do but others have come before me and no it is not my way, it is the correct way on certain standards.
So shake your head - they are tools in the toolbox. The purpose of this forum is NOT to listen to what Canute says is the gospel. It IS to share and collaborate on a multitude of things. You make it a one way conversation and turn it into 'you do things your way and I'll do them mine'. If that s how you feel, then what can I say!
This is NOT like the scenario described above - TOTALLY different scenario. Using the scenario above, I know of no experienced person here that would do such a thing. You would be surprised the kinds of methods out there. I went to visit a new Karaoke Show last week. It was a a Bar that holds about 100, pretty small. The KJ had two QSC K 10s, one was pointed to the audience and the other was on the floor pointed towards the Singer. Of course I shook my head. I went up to the Couple and asked them to see the settings (They were using the same Karaoke Software that I do). When the Guy opened the settings, it confirmed my fears, yep they were running their output in Stereo. The point is that others see this and think it is the way to do things. Plain and simple, what they were doing was WRONG. It is not a matter of my way, it is wrong!
iTunes is a tool that MAY be used. The vendors of some of this 'DJ software' will even tell you ways to use iTunes to benefit your sw experience. Are they also not developing products in a proper manner? Software vendors may include the ability to read iTunes and its folders. They are in the market to sell their product to anyone, even wannabees. The more stuff they include that will appeal to more people, the more product will be sold.
Again, TOTALLY different discussion! iTunes can manage and read tags on media just as good as any other product out there. Are we suggesting using iTunes for DJing? Absolutely not! Now if you can pull off a successful show mixing and everything else you need to do using multiple systems with iTunes, who am I to knock you down. You CAN hear a difference between low and high bit rates of a song. Would it matter to the client? Possibly. If you are using 2 systems, both with iTunes, and there are no flaws - how would the client know any different?
Am I suggesting someone try this - absolutely not. Could it be done, absolutely. I'm certain it probably has. This comes back to having multiple ways to accomplish the same task. You should ALWAYS have tools in the toolbox.
In addition, the way you do things does not make them the correct way. They are YOUR way - adopted from elsewhere or otherwise. I would like to take the credit for things that I do but others have come before me and no it is not my way, it is the correct way on certain standards. Hence why they are adopted from elsewhere - because YOU use them, they are YOUR way. My way isn't my way because I invented it. We all have ways we have learned to do things from others or from our own experiences. This collection is YOUR way. By not claiming it as your way, is this how you get around being blamed if it didn't work?
So shake your head - they are tools in the toolbox. The purpose of this forum is NOT to listen to what Canute says is the gospel. It IS to share and collaborate on a multitude of things. You make it a one way conversation and turn it into 'you do things your way and I'll do them mine'. If that s how you feel, then what can I say! There is nothing you can say - but you can see the evidence on this site alone. This is not my opinion alone. It's up to you to change the perception you give people. Maybe it's time to look in the mirror. This is a site to share. If you want a site where everything you say is Gospel, then sponsor your own sub forum (Danno could use the money) .. or open your own site.
This is NOT like the scenario described above - TOTALLY different scenario. Using the scenario above, I know of no experienced person here that would do such a thing. You would be surprised the kinds of methods out there. I went to visit a new Karaoke Show last week. It was a a Bar that holds about 100, pretty small. The KJ had two QSC K 10s, one was pointed to the audience and the other was on the floor pointed towards the Singer. Of course I shook my head. I went up to the Couple and asked them to see the settings (They were using the same Karaoke Software that I do). When the Guy opened the settings, it confirmed my fears, yep they were running their output in Stereo. The point is that others see this and think it is the way to do things. Plain and simple, what they were doing was WRONG. It is not a matter of my way, it is wrong! Again, this has NOTHING to do with the topic at hand. This was also your firsthand experience with one person in a specific venue. That does not apply to all.
iTunes is a tool that MAY be used. The vendors of some of this 'DJ software' will even tell you ways to use iTunes to benefit your sw experience. Are they also not developing products in a proper manner? Software vendors may include the ability to read iTunes and its folders. They are in the market to sell their product to anyone, even wannabees. The more stuff they include that will appeal to more people, the more product will be sold. For the price of some of this SW, I doubt it's targeted to 'wannabees'.
Again, TOTALLY different discussion! iTunes can manage and read tags on media just as good as any other product out there. Are we suggesting using iTunes for DJing? Absolutely not! Now if you can pull off a successful show mixing and everything else you need to do using multiple systems with iTunes, who am I to knock you down. You CAN hear a difference between low and high bit rates of a song. Would it matter to the client? Possibly. If you are using 2 systems, both with iTunes, and there are no flaws - how would the client know any different?
Am I suggesting someone try this - absolutely not. Could it be done, absolutely. I'm certain it probably has. This comes back to having multiple ways to accomplish the same task. You should ALWAYS have tools in the toolbox.
Some answers in red. Make sure you have the right tools for the job, not just any tools. I can run Zip Cord wires to my speakers but it does not mean I should. However I would definitely not recommend it to anyone or lead them to believe its is an option. It should not!
What I do get is, if I say "Black" you guys say "White", if I say "Up" you guys say "down". If you don't like what I post or don't want to follow then just shut up and do your thing! Don't prolong the discussion.
For Mike (ittigger) : When one studies Electronics or whatever Subjects, the Professor's role is not to teach the students any old which way. His job is to teach the Correct way. maybe you should go out and visit Bars, Clubs and other DJ shows to see what others are doing to learn not just what to do but also what not to do. You are telling me that if I get training to do something that is a tried and proven system/method that it becomes MY Way! What have you been smoking?
If one way is faster and more efficient, yet both accomplish the same thing -- which would you use...?
Go back to the beginning and read. Maybe then you will comprehend. Nowhere was I claiming anything to be My Way. I started out by saying that iTunes methods for Organizing files was way to tedious that you end up with a Gazillion Genres and layers of folders/directories/sub directories. You and Steve are the ones that are claiming it was my way. By using that Buzz Phrase you know you will have others siding with you against me and what i have to say. I also never said iTunes was the wrong way. What I was proposing was that the DJ software was more superior to just allowing iTunes to automatically sort and organize the Files.He hasn't said nor proven that anything is any faster or more efficient than anything anyone else does. All he's doing is saying his way (that he's also claiming is not his) is the correct way. If I can do something but it's not efficient for me (regardless of how efficient it is in reality), how efficient is it really?
Go back to the beginning and read. Maybe then you will comprehend. Nowhere was I claiming anything to be My Way. I started out by saying that iTunes methods for Organizing files was way to tedious that you end up with a Gazillion Genres and layers of folders/directories/sub directories. You and Steve are the ones that are claiming it was my way. By using that Buzz Phrase you know you will have others siding with you against me and what i have to say. I also never said iTunes was the wrong way. What I was proposing was that the DJ software was more superior to just allowing iTunes to automatically sort and organize the Files.
He hasn't said nor proven that anything is any faster or more efficient than anything anyone else does. All he's doing is saying his way (that he's also claiming is not his) is the correct way. If I can do something but it's not efficient for me (regardless of how efficient it is in reality), how efficient is it really?
Alot of this probably also depends on what you use and how you use it - so how can someone not there explicitly state that 'A' is the correct way?
No, I'm not saying whatever works for you is not good -- that's up to you.
But as a developer, I do my best to make things more efficient. That's the whole purpose of writing DJ software -- make it easier and faster, for the user to do his/her task, and not have to use the OS.
When I first started DJ'ing, I had a turntable and 8-track player. You had to keep your records and tapes organized. So when I started writing the DJ software some 13-14 years ago, I got my pad and pen out, and diagrammed how the process worked -- flow chart. What I found, was that at the last few seconds of a song, you might change your mind based on crowd response, to what you wanted to play next.
Hence the need for speed and efficiency. I could browse through folders if I wanted, but it takes too long.
As for Canute -- well, he's Canute -- I can't make him more efficient, not my job
You never know what song you may need at a gig. I was a boy scout and their model was be prepared. At least he'll have him if he needs it. Also the Windows 8 thing just goes to show that new is not always better. Sometimes good old tried and true works much better then new.Just curious Curt -- why would you even bother putting that many songs on your HDD?
Yer gonna play maybe 3 of those songs. And if we do the math, what does it cost you per year (and wasted space and search indexing time) for all that wasted stuff that you will never play?
TOTALLY AGREE!!!! (on a side note, we've already had this discussion - the whole basic user / advanced user thing).
It is very interesting that the ones on here who really DJ for a living do not have a problem with some of the things I post. Some things you post make sense, others do not, so "some" is accurate. It is always the Hobbyists who want to post things that they do THEIR way and bristle when it is pointed out that the real DJ world does not operate that way. I point out things because there are new people on here all the time and therefore they should get to know the other options. As Tig and others have said .. that is what a chat board is for. And I bristle because the "real world" does operate this way. And honestly, you have not given even 1 piece of evidence that what I shared was an incorrect way of doing things. The fact that you were trained in a different methodology before iTunes existed, or maybe before computers did, is moot .. just another way.
When I hear of so called DJs who have a DJ Software but use Windows Media or Winamp to run music for a Cocktail Hour I have to shake my head. So running cocktail hour music on a Pioneer MEP is substantially different as you have stated you have done? Do they really don't know that the DJ software can run two or more Playlists? If what you all are proposing is that "You do things your way and I will do things my way", what then is the purpose of coming onto the Forum? I agree .. what is the purpose if I can't propose my way, which works, and you have yet to find anything wrong with except to continue to say "toy".
That is like someone connecting the negative conductor of the speaker cable to the Positive Terminal of an amplifier and telling you it has always worked for them. Should one not correct that person and show/tell them the correct way of hooking up the cables? Why have to sugar coat and dance around the issue. I am a straightforward speaker, I do not like sugar coating anything (except the Redhead) But, unlike connecting a speaker to the wong terminal, there is no RIGHT way to rip songs, no "right" way to manage songs, and no right way to DJ songs.
DJ Software was made for DJs, iTunes was not designed for DJs, period. Neither are dollar store consumer cables, and yet they work. If one does not know how to customize their DJ software to perform their tasks and have to resort to iTunes to do it for them, oh well! Again, different tools .. I do not have 1 DJ app (and I have a bunch .. VDJ, PCDJ, Serato, and Rockit) that allow you to rip cds .. so somewhere, one needs tools .. whether to rip, equalize loudness, tag, or manage files .. we need tools. iTunes is a tool that works and for those of us that have idevices, works just fine.
Don't you guys get down on people for using Media formats that you say is inferior such as a file that is a Wav vs a file that is a 128 bit rate? What if I told you that it does not matter to the clients, that the file would still play regardless of which one is used? Those who know better will tell you to use the Wav. This is no different to what I am proposing here with the iTunes method vs the DJ Software method. So why all the fuss? What DJ method? I don't see it in the ADJA rules. I don't see them posted on the DJ application websites. WHERE are these rules of which you speak? WHERE?
Go back to the beginning and read. Maybe then you will comprehend. Nowhere was I claiming anything to be My Way. I started out by saying that iTunes methods for Organizing files was way to tedious that you end up with a Gazillion Genres and layers of folders/directories/sub directories. You and Steve are the ones that are claiming it was my way. By using that Buzz Phrase you know you will have others siding with you against me and what i have to say. I also never said iTunes was the wrong way. What I was proposing was that the DJ software was more superior to just allowing iTunes to automatically sort and organize the Files.
DJ Software was made for DJs, iTunes was not designed for DJs, period.
Remember we have newbies looking at these threads and they need to know the correct way not just any way.
Hobbyists with their toys handle things their own way, eh!
True DJs do not use iTunes. That is for novices!
I also never said iTunes was the wrong way.
By using that Buzz Phrase you know you will have others siding with you against me and what i have to say.